Nancy Davila Espejo v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 6, 202620-73298California908 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 6 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NANCY DAVILA ESPEJO; ORLANDO No. 20-73298

BARAJAS DAVILA; KARLA BARAJAS

DAVILA, Agency Nos. A208-599-377

A208-599-378

Petitioners, A208-599-379

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 2, 2026** Seattle, Washington

Before: PAEZ, BEA, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Nancy Davila Espejo and her two children, Orlando Barajas Davila and Karla

Barajas Davila, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). judge’s (IJ) order denying their…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.