Orduna
United States v. Orduna
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 6 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-7565 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:24-cr-00096-SMM-1 v.
MEMORANDUM*
WHILBERT ORDUNA, AKA Whilbert Orduna Guevara, AKA Whilbert Orduna- Guevara,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Stephen M. McNamee, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 4, 2026** Phoenix, Arizona
Before: HAWKINS, BYBEE, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Defendant Whilbert Orduna appeals his conviction for re-entry under
U.S.C. § 1326(a). Defendant contends that his removal order was “fundamentally
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). unfair” because he received ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.