Kuntz
United States v. Kuntz
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 6, 202625-2667California1,051 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 6 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 25-2667 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:24-cr-02-BU-DLC v.
MEMORANDUM*
KEVIN RICHARD KUNTZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Dana L. Christensen, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted February 26, 2026 Spokane, Washington
Before: SUNG, H.A. THOMAS, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.
Appellant Kevin Richard Kuntz appeals the district court’s revocation of his
probation and imposition of a 24-month custodial sentence. We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We reverse and remand.
Because probation revocation is not part of a criminal prosecution, the Sixth
Amendment’s Confrontation Clause does not directly apply. See United States v.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Hall, 419 F.3d 980, 985–86 (9th Cir. 2005); Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471,