Nai Horizon v. Amadeus Therapy, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 6, 202625-3867California559 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 6 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: AMADEUS THERAPY, INC. No. 25-3867 D.C. No. Debtor 24-1049 _____________________________

MEMORANDUM*

NAI HORIZON,

Appellant.

v.

AMADEUS THERAPY, INC.,

Appellee.

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Julia W. Brand, Gary A. Spraker, and Frederick Philip Corbit, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Submitted March 4, 2026** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: HAWKINS, BYBEE, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Appellant NAI Horizon (“NAI”) appeals from an order of the Ninth Circuit

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, affirming the bankruptcy court’s denial of NAI’s Rule

60(d)(3) Motion for Relief from Judgment. NAI argues that it established that debtor

Amadeus Therapy, Inc. (“Debtor”) and its principal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.