Angel Brown, et al. v. City of Gardena, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20262:25-cv-06271California1,115 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION

9 10 Case No. CV 25-06271-DMG (AS) ANGEL BROWN, et al., ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, Plaintiffs, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CITY OF GARDENA, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the 20 First Amended Complaint, all of the records herein, the Report and 21 Recommendation of a United States Magistrate Judge (“Report” [Doc. 22 # 28]), and Plaintiffs’ Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report 23 and Recommendation (“Objections” [Doc. # 29]). 24 25 The Report recommends the dismissal of the First Amended 26 Complaint with leave to amend. Plaintiffs’ objections to the 27 28 Report do not merit any change to the Report’s findings or recommendations. 3 Plaintiffs object that Defendant City of Gardena, before filing its motion to dismiss, failed to comply with the meet-and- confer obligations of Local Rule 7-3. Objections at 5-6. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.