Nancy Vargas Vargas v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 9, 202620-72251California573 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 9 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NANCY VARGAS VARGAS, No. 20-72251

Petitioner, Agency No. A202-176-744

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 5, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, DE ALBA, and TUNG, Circuit Judges.

Nancy Vargas Vargas, a native and citizen of Colombia, petitions for review

of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision dismissing her appeal from

an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order denying her applications for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition.

“Where[, as here,] the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.