Muhammed Ruhel Miah v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 9, 202617-72150California787 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

MAR 9 2026

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MUHAMMED RUHEL MIAH, No. 17-72150 18-70264 Petitioner, Agency No. A206-676-202 v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 2, 2026** Seattle, Washington

Before: PAEZ, BEA, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Muhammed Ruhel Miah (“Ruhel Miah”), a native and citizen of

Bangladesh, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)

decision dismissing his appeal of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision, which

denied his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under

the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Ruhel Miah also seeks review of a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision decision of the BIA denying his motion to reconsider and motion to reopen based

on his later taking a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.