Karen Estrada-Payes v. Pamela Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 9, 202616-71774California788 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 9 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KAREN SUCELY ESTRADA-PAYES; et No. 16-71774 al., Agency Nos. A206-036-648 Petitioners, A206-036-649
A206-036-647
v.
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 4, 2026** Pasadena, California
Before: WARDLAW and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges, and BROWN,*** District Judge.
Karen Sucely Estrada-Payes, Sammy Alexander Enriquez-Orantes
(“Enriquez”), and J.A.E.E. (collectively, “Petitioners”), natives and citizens of
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jeffrey Vincent Brown, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Texas, sitting by designation. Guatemala, petition for review of a…