Karen Estrada-Payes v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 9, 202616-71774California788 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 9 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KAREN SUCELY ESTRADA-PAYES; et No. 16-71774 al., Agency Nos. A206-036-648 Petitioners, A206-036-649

A206-036-647

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 4, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges, and BROWN,*** District Judge.

Karen Sucely Estrada-Payes, Sammy Alexander Enriquez-Orantes

(“Enriquez”), and J.A.E.E. (collectively, “Petitioners”), natives and citizens of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jeffrey Vincent Brown, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Texas, sitting by designation. Guatemala, petition for review of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.