Geidy Orellana-Mejia v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 9, 202620-70673California676 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 9 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GEIDY ONDINA ORELLANA-MEJIA; No. 20-70673

CARLOS JAIR GOMEZ-ORELLANA,

Agency Nos. A206-362-214 Petitioners, A206-362-215

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 5, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, DE ALBA, and TUNG, Circuit Judges.

Geidy Ondina Orellana-Mejia (“Orellana”) and her son Carlos Jair Gomez-

Orellana (“Gomez”), natives and citizens of Honduras, seek review of a decision

by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing their appeal from an

Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of their applications for asylum, withholding of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). removal, and protection…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.