Geidy Orellana-Mejia v. Pamela Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 9, 202620-70673California676 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 9 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GEIDY ONDINA ORELLANA-MEJIA; No. 20-70673
CARLOS JAIR GOMEZ-ORELLANA,
Agency Nos. A206-362-214 Petitioners, A206-362-215
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 5, 2026** Pasadena, California
Before: WARDLAW, DE ALBA, and TUNG, Circuit Judges.
Geidy Ondina Orellana-Mejia (“Orellana”) and her son Carlos Jair Gomez-
Orellana (“Gomez”), natives and citizens of Honduras, seek review of a decision
by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing their appeal from an
Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of their applications for asylum, withholding of
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). removal, and protection…