Bondi

Sanchez Pinmentel v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 9, 202624-6825California564 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 9 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBIN BLADMIRO SANCHEZ No. 24-6825 PINMENTEL, Agency No.

A200-602-751

Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 5, 2026** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: HAWKINS, BYBEE, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Robin Bladmiro Sanchez Pinmentel petitions for review of a decision of the

Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his motion to sua sponte reopen.

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We have jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision not to reopen removal

proceedings sua sponte only “for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.