Jimenez-Martinez

Jimenez-Martinez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 9, 202624-3313California394 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 9 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE ALBERTO JIMENEZ-MARTINEZ, No. 24-3313 Agency No. Petitioner, A076-743-387 v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 5, 2026** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: HAWKINS, BYBEE, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Jose Alberto Jimenez-Martinez (“Jimenez-Martinez”) seeks review

of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the Immigration

Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his motion to reopen. Reviewing for abuse of discretion,

Avagyan v. Holder, 646 F.3d 672, 678 (9th Cir. 2011), we deny the petition.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Petitioner was initially removed in 1999 after…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.