Tan

Tan v. Chan CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 9, 2026H051616MCalifornia5,958 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lie, J.

Filed 3/9/26 Tan v. Chan CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

TUN SEIN TAN, H051616

(Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. 21CV387894)

v. ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

AND DENYING REHEARING

WAN SEIN CHAN et al.,

NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT

Defendants and Appellants.

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on February 10, 2026, be modified as follows: At the end of the penultimate sentence, on page 14, after the sentence “This undisputed summary judgment evidence demonstrates that Tan demanded access to the records under section 16403, subdivision (b) and Chan refused,” add as footnote 15 the following footnote, which will require…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.