1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RICHARD K. MORRISON, Case No. 24-cv-07139-HSG

8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO SEAL

9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 38 10 CITIBANK, N.A., et al., 11 Defendants.

12 13 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to seal, Dkt. No. 38. Courts generally 14 apply a “compelling reasons” standard when considering motions to seal documents. Pintos v. 15 Pac. Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 677–78 (9th Cir. 2010) (quoting Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of 16 Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006)). “This standard derives from the common law 17 right ‘to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and 18 documents.’” Id. (quoting Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178). “[A] strong presumption in favor of 19 access is the starting point.” Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178 (quotations omitted). To overcome this 20 strong presumption, the moving party must “articulate compelling reasons supported by specific 21 factual findings that outweigh the general history of access and the public policies favoring 22 disclosure, such as the public interest in understanding the judicial process.” Id. at 1178–79 23 (citations, internal quotation marks, and alterations omitted). 24 Dkt. No. 38 seeks to redact account numbers, birth dates, social security numbers, and 25 other personally identifiable information from four exhibits submitted in connection with 26 Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. See Dkt. No. 38 at 2. The Court has confirmed that 27 the redactions are narrowly tailored to the personal information at issue. This personal 1 and the Court is persuaded that there is a compelling reason for these redactions. Bene v. Wells 2 Fargo of San Leandro, No. 22-CV-06782-HSG, 2024 WL 332895, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2024) 3 (permitting redactions of social security numbers, sensitive financial details, and other personal 4 || information); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a) (requiring redactions of birth dates and social security 5 numbers). The Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion to seal. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: 1/15/2026 °

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

10 United States District Judge 11 12

13

15 16

= 17

Z 18

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28