Jessie Perez v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 10, 202620-72631California1,654 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 10 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JESSIE PEREZ, No. 20-72631

Petitioner, Agency No. A205-719-246

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 6, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, DESAI, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Jessie Perez seeks review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’

(“BIA”) decision dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order

denying her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under

the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1252 and grant in part and deny in part the petition.

Where, as here, the BIA agrees…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.