Gerardo Martinez v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 10, 202620-73105California911 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 10 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GERARDO NUNO MARTINEZ; SANDRA No. 20-73105

GUADALUPE CRUZ MORENO;

GERARDO RAMSES NUNO CRUZ; Agency Nos. A206-677-856

MARIANA ZOE NUNO CRUZ, A206-677-848

A206-677-849

Petitioners, A206-677-850

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 6, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, DESAI, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Gerardo Nuno Martinez (“Nuno Martinez”), his wife Sandra Guadalupe

Cruz Morena (“Cruz Morena”), and their two minor children, natives and citizens

of Mexico, petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). decision dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.