Aguilar-Padilla
Aguilar-Padilla v. Boydstun Equipment Manufacturing, LLC
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 10, 202624-4536California2,205 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 10 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JULIO AGUILAR-PADILLA, Nos. 24-4536, 25-276 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:21-cv-00753-MO v. MEMORANDUM*
BOYDSTUN EQUIPMENT
MANUFACTURING, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted February 5, 2026 Portland, Oregon
Before: BEA, CHRISTEN, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.
Boydstun Equipment Manufacturing fired Julio Aguilar-Padilla after he took
COVID-19 leave pursuant to an Oregon state agency’s COVID-era administrative
rule designed to protect quarantining workers from retaliation. See Or. Admin. R.
437-001-0744(3)(l)(B) (2020) (hereinafter “COVID Rule”). Aguilar-Padilla sought
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. statutory and noneconomic damages pursuant to federal…