Ramachandran

Ramachandran v. City of Los Altos

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 10, 202624-4894California2,303 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAR 10 2026

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SATISH RAMACHANDRAN, No. 24-4894

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 5:18-CV-01223-VKD v.

CITY OF LOS ALTOS, et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the District Court for the Northern District of California Hon. Virginia K. DeMarchi, Presiding Magistrate Judge

Argued and Submitted March 3, 2026 San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS and GOULD, Circuit Judges, and MORRIS, Chief District Judge.**

Satish Ramachandran appeals the district court’s grant of Appellees’ motion

for judgment on the pleadings; the order denying his motion for relief from, or

amendment of, judgment under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rules”)

and 60; the order denying in part Appellant’s motion for leave to amend his Third

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Brian Morris, Chief United States District Judge for the District of Montana,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.