Bondi

Pulla Farez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 10, 202625-197California816 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 10 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HILDA SABINA PULLA FAREZ; No. 25-197 GENESIS AGUIAR PULLA, Agency Nos.

A241-497-681

Petitioners, A241-497-682 v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 6, 2026** Seattle, Washington

Before: PAEZ, BEA, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Hilda Sabina Pulla Farez (“Petitioner”) and her daughter (collectively,

“Petitioners”), natives and citizens of Ecuador, petition for review of a decision of

the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), which dismissed their appeal of an

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of their applications for asylum,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.