Bondi
Pulla Farez v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 10, 202625-197California816 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 10 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HILDA SABINA PULLA FAREZ; No. 25-197 GENESIS AGUIAR PULLA, Agency Nos.
A241-497-681
Petitioners, A241-497-682 v. MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 6, 2026** Seattle, Washington
Before: PAEZ, BEA, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.
Hilda Sabina Pulla Farez (“Petitioner”) and her daughter (collectively,
“Petitioners”), natives and citizens of Ecuador, petition for review of a decision of
the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), which dismissed their appeal of an
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of their applications for asylum,…