Rojas-Espinoza

Rojas-Espinoza v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 10, 202624-7536California2,088 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 10 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARICRUZ MARISOL ROJAS- No. 24-7536 ESPINOZA; ROBERT DAVID Agency Nos.

SALVADOR-GOMEZ; DAVID ANGEL A246-606-483

SALVADOR-ROJAS; KORINA A246-606-482

SALVADOR-ROJAS,

A246-606-484

A246-606-485

Petitioners,

v. ORDER

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

Before: Mary H. Murguia, Chief Judge, and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Ronald M. Gould, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Morgan B. Christen, Michelle T. Friedland, Eric D. Miller, Bridget S. Bade, Kenneth K. Lee, Holly A. Thomas, and Eric C. Tung, Circuit Judges.

Concurrence by Chief Judge Murguia Statement by Judge Tung

Petitioners’ opposed motion to stay removal (Dkt. No. 3) is DENIED. See

Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 434 (2009); Leiva-Perez v. Holder, 640 F.3d 962,

964-65 (9th Cir. 2011). The temporary stay of removal entered pursuant to

General Order 6.4(c) is lifted, effective immediately.

FILED

MAR 10…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.