Rojas-Espinoza
Rojas-Espinoza v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 10, 202624-7536California2,088 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 10 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARICRUZ MARISOL ROJAS- No. 24-7536 ESPINOZA; ROBERT DAVID Agency Nos.
SALVADOR-GOMEZ; DAVID ANGEL A246-606-483
SALVADOR-ROJAS; KORINA A246-606-482
SALVADOR-ROJAS,
A246-606-484
A246-606-485
Petitioners,
v. ORDER
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
Before: Mary H. Murguia, Chief Judge, and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Ronald M. Gould, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Morgan B. Christen, Michelle T. Friedland, Eric D. Miller, Bridget S. Bade, Kenneth K. Lee, Holly A. Thomas, and Eric C. Tung, Circuit Judges.
Concurrence by Chief Judge Murguia Statement by Judge Tung
Petitioners’ opposed motion to stay removal (Dkt. No. 3) is DENIED. See
Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 434 (2009); Leiva-Perez v. Holder, 640 F.3d 962,
964-65 (9th Cir. 2011). The temporary stay of removal entered pursuant to
General Order 6.4(c) is lifted, effective immediately.