Aron Benavides v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 11, 202620-70872California1,103 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 11 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARON RENE BENAVIDES, No. 20-70872

Petitioner, A089-294-403

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 4, 2026 ** San Francisco, California

Before: M. SMITH and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and MORRIS, Chief District Judge. ***

Petitioner Aron Rene Benavides (“Benavides”), native and citizen of Mexico,

petitions for review on two grounds. Benavides first contends that the Board of

Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) violated his due process rights by denying his motion

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Brian Morris, United States Chief District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.