Bondi

De Luna-Ensaldo v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 11, 202625-1379California1,023 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 11 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULIO CESAR DE LUNA-ENSALDO, No. 25-1379 Agency No. Petitioner, A216-625-982 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 3, 2026** Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN, PAEZ, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Julio Cesar De Luna-Ensaldo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision denying his motion for

administrative closure and dismissing his appeal of an immigration judge’s (IJ) order

denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.