Warren

Warren v. Shahar CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 11, 2026B339274California5,584 words

Opinion

Opinion

Collins, J.

INTRODUCTION

Martin Warren and Bessie Warren sued their adult sons, Scott Warren and Bruce Warren, over some family financial disagreements. Scott1 then cross-complained and included his sister, Lauri Shahar, as a cross-defendant. After a trial, Scott prevailed. The trial court entered a single judgment, which stated that Martin and Bessie take nothing on their complaint, and Scott could recover his costs against them; it also stated that Lauri was liable to Scott for $600,000 on the cross-complaint, and Scott could recover his costs against her. Scott then filed a single memorandum of costs that included all of his costs incurred—both in defending the complaint and in prosecuting the cross-complaint. Lauri, mistaking the memorandum of costs as pertaining only to Scott’s litigation against Martin and Bessie, did not move to strike or tax costs. Lauri paid the $600,000 judgment against her. Scott then attempted to recover his full amount of costs from Lauri: $175,195.47. This amount included $107,476.25 in expert witness fees under Code of Civil Procedure 998,2 based on a section 998 offer to compromise that Scott served only on Martin and Bessie. Lauri moved under section 473,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.