Mohinder Singh v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 12, 202620-70288California780 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 12 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MOHINDER SINGH, No. 20-70288

Petitioner, Agency No. A205-935-371

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 10, 2026** San Francisco, California

Before: H.A. THOMAS and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges, and VERA,*** District Judge.

Mohinder Singh, a citizen and native of India, petitions for review of a

Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal of an order

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Hernan Diego Vera, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation. from an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) (collectively, the “Agency”) denying his

applications for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.