Santos Hernandez-Miranda v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 12, 202621-70361California692 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 12 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SANTOS HERNANDEZ-MIRANDA, No. 21-70361 Agency No. Petitioner, A200-149-341 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 3, 2026** Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN, PAEZ, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Santos Hernandez-Miranda, a native and citizen of Mexico, seeks

review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision affirming the denial

of his application for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1).

Hernandez-Miranda’s core claim is that the Immigration Judge (“IJ”) displayed

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). bias in the underlying immigration court proceeding in violation of his due process

rights. He also…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.