Maria Gonzalez-Nicolas v. Pamela Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 12, 202621-70696California1,462 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MAR 12 2026
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARIA GONZALEZ NICOLAS and No. 21-70696
A.A.G.M.,
Agency Nos. Petitioners, A208-181-978
A208-181-979
v.
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent. MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 13, 2026** San Francisco, California
Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and S.R. THOMAS and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Maria Gonzalez Nicolas petitions for review of a decision by the Board of
Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against
Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Because the
parties are familiar with the history…