People v. Cena CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 12, 2026D087170California4,623 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/12/26 P. v. Cena CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, D087170

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. RIF2201001)

SALVADOR CENA,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County, Jason Armand, Judge. Affirmed. Wallin & Klarich and Jonathan M. Lynn for Defendant and Appellant. Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Lance E. Winters and Charles C. Ragland, Chief Assistant Attorneys General, Steve Oetting and Daniel J. Hilton, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. Salvador Cena appeals following his conviction of sexual penetration

of a person under the age of 14 (Pen. Code,1 § 289, subd. (j)) and committing a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.