Nailing

Nailing v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 12, 202624-5216California732 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 12 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

XAVIER NAILING, No. 24-5216 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:22-cv-07224-AB-JC v.

MEMORANDUM*

CITY OF LOS ANGELES; GARCIA, an individual; Serial No. 42501; ALTAMITRANO, an individual; Serial No. 42570,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California André Birotte, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 12, 2026**

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Xavier Nailing appeals pro se from the district court’s grant of summary

judgment in favor of defendants City of Los Angeles and Los Angeles Police

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Officers Garcia and Altamirano in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Nailing alleged

that his Fourth and Fourteenth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.