Hill

Hill v. Bisignano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 12, 202625-1060California751 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 12 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KELLY HILL, No. 25-1060 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:24-cv-01246-JAT v. MEMORANDUM*

FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James A. Teilborg, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 4, 2026** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: HAWKINS, BYBEE, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Kelly Hill appeals the district court’s decision affirming the Commissioner of

Social Security’s denial of her application for Child’s Insurance Benefits and

Supplemental Security Income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We review the district court’s decision “de novo,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.