Hill
Hill v. Bisignano
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 12, 202625-1060California751 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 12 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KELLY HILL, No. 25-1060 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:24-cv-01246-JAT v. MEMORANDUM*
FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James A. Teilborg, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 4, 2026** Phoenix, Arizona
Before: HAWKINS, BYBEE, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Kelly Hill appeals the district court’s decision affirming the Commissioner of
Social Security’s denial of her application for Child’s Insurance Benefits and
Supplemental Security Income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We review the district court’s decision “de novo,…