Ditto

United States v. Ditto

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 12, 202624-7191California406 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 12 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-7191 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:23-cr-00376-SB-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

CHARLES DITTO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 10, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: RAWLINSON and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges, and LIBURDI, District Judge.*** Charles Ditto appeals his conviction following a conditional guilty plea. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The district court did not clearly err by finding that the evidence from

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Michael T. Liburdi, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.