Nikoghosyan

Nikoghosyan v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 12, 202621-155California542 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 12 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SARGIS NIKOGHOSYAN, No. 21-155 Agency No. Petitioner, A075-671-405 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, U.S., Attorney General,

Respondent.

Appeal from the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 10, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: RAWLINSON and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges, and LIBURDI, District Judge.*** Petitioner Sargis Nikoghosyan seeks review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ denial of his Motion to Reopen proceedings as to his application for

asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention against Torture.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Michael T. Liburdi, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.