Armstrong
Olympus Spa v. Armstrong
Opinion
Opinion
MCKEOWN Dissent by Judge LEE Statement Respecting the Denial of Rehearing En Banc by Judge MCKEOWN Additional Statement Respecting the Denial of Rehearing En Banc by Judge, J.
FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 12 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
OLYMPUS SPA; et al., No. 23-4031 D.C. No. Plaintiffs - Appellants, 2:22-cv-00340-BJR Western District of Washington, v. Seattle ANDRETA ARMSTRONG, Executive ORDER AND AMENDED Director of the Washington State Human OPINION Rights Commission and MADISON
IMIOLA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Before: McKEOWN, GOULD, and LEE, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge MCKEOWN Dissent by Judge LEE Statement Respecting the Denial of Rehearing En Banc by Judge MCKEOWN Additional Statement Respecting the Denial of Rehearing En Banc by Judge
MCKEOWN
Statement Respecting the Denial of Rehearing En Banc by Judge OWENS Dissent from Denial of Rehearing En Banc by Judge VANDYKE Dissent from Denial of Rehearing En Banc by Judge TUNG Dissent from Denial of Rehearing En Banc by Judge COLLINS
The opinion filed May 29, 2025, and reported at 138 F.4th 1204 is hereby
amended. The dissent is unchanged. The amended opinion will be filed
concurrently with this order.