Henrikh Vardanyan v. Warden, Adelanto ICE Processing Center, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20265:25-cv-03272California466 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 5:25-cv-03272-SVW (SK) Date: January 14, 2026 Title Henrikh Vardanyan v. Warden, Adelanto ICE Processing Center, et al.

Present: The Honorable: Steve Kim, United States Magistrate Judge

Connie Chung n/a Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Respondent: None present None present Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS MOOT

On December 4, 2025, petitioner Henrikh Vardanyan filed a habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging his prolonged detention without a bond hearing. (ECF 1). After briefing, the court ordered respondents to show cause why petitioner should not receive an individualized bond hearing. (ECF 8). In response, respondents explained that petitioner received an individualized Rodriguez bond hearing on December 8, 2025—four days after the petition was filed. (ECF 10 at 4). Rodriguez hearings require the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) to establish by clear and convincing evidence that prolonged detention is necessary. Rodriguez v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.