Fernando Ramos Garcia v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 13, 202620-73649California692 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 13 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FERNANDO RAMOS GARCIA, No. 20-73649 Agency No. A200-245-488 Petitioner,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 11, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.***

Petitioner Fernando Ramos Garcia applied for asylum, withholding of

removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. His application

was denied. He does not challenge that denial on the merits, but he seeks review

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable David F. Hamilton, United States Circuit Judge for the 7th Circuit, sitting by designation. of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision affirming the denial of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.