Lee Beitman v. Corizon Health, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 13, 202621-16000California650 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 13 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LEE MICHAEL BEITMAN, No. 21-16000

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:17-cv-03829-JAT

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CORIZON HEALTH, INC., Contracted Health Care Provider at ADOC; MARTIN

GRUENBERG; CHARLES L. RYAN;

CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC;

DAVID SHINN, Director, BENNIE

ROLLINS,

Defendants-Appellees,

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James A. Teilborg, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 13, 2026**

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Arizona state prisoner Lee Michael Beitman appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment following a three-day jury trial in his action under 42 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1983 alleging deliberate indifference to his medical needs…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.