Bondi

Cortez Perez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 13, 202623-3517California537 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 13 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANGELICA CORTEZ PEREZ; F. A. A. C.; No. 23-3517 D. V. A. C.; F. J. A. C., Agency Nos.

A208-600-728

Petitioners, A208-600-729

A208-600-730

v.

A208-600-731

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 11, 2026** San Francisco, California

Before: H.A. THOMAS and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges, and VERA, District Judge.***

Angelica Cortez Perez and her three children are natives and citizens of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Hernan Diego Vera, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation. Mexico.1 Cortez Perez petitions for review of a decision of the Board…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.