Belinda Muhammad v. Bretanniyia Jenkins
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 13, 202623-55287California451 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 13 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BELINDA C. MUHAMMAD, No. 23-55287
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-07970-JAK-PVC v.
BRETANNIYIA JENKINS, Bus Driver for MEMORANDUM* LACMTA, individual and official capacity,
Defendant-Appellee,
and
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION
AUTHORITY; PHILLIP A.
WASHINGTON; JANE DOE; DOES, 1-10,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John A. Kronstadt, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 13, 2026**
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: O’SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Belinda C. Muhammad appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
after a jury trial in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that Bretanniyia Jenkins
called…