Aaron Zamora v. Arizona Board of Regents

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 13, 202623-16099California883 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 13 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AARON M. ZAMORA, No. 23-16099

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-01583-SPL

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS, a political subdivision of the state of Arizona, and Arizona State University, a public university; ARIZONA STATE

UNIVERSITY,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Steven Paul Logan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 13, 2026**

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Aaron Zamora appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his action against the Arizona Board of Regents (“ABOR”) and Arizona State

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). University (“ASU”). Zamora alleges claims for disparate treatment arising from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.