Xu

Xu v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 13, 202624-7025California835 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 13 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GUANGYAO XU, No. 24-4296 Agency No. Petitioner, A246-616-813 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

GUANGYAO XU, No. 24-7025 Agency No. Petitioner, A246-616-813 v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 11, 2026** San Francisco, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: H.A. THOMAS and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges, and VERA, District Judge.***

Guangyao Xu, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China,

petitions for review of two orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”).

The first petition seeks review of the BIA’s summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.