United States v. Johnson

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 13, 202625-1860California549 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 13 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 25-1860 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:23-cr-00099-KJM-2 v.

MEMORANDUM*

BRIAN KEITH JOHNSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Kimberly J. Mueller, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 11, 2026** San Francisco, California

Before: H.A. THOMAS and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges, and VERA, District Judge.***

Brian Keith Johnson appeals his sentence for possessing a firearm after

being convicted of a felony, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Hernan Diego Vera, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation. jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.