Yu

Yu v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan CA1/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 13, 2026A169089California7,563 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wilson, J.

I. BACKGROUND1

Yu started working for Kaiser in 2011 as a senior data consultant. Beginning in 2015, Yu reported to El-Daoushy, a manager in Yu’s department. A conflict soon arose between El-Daoushy and Yu over El-Daoushy’s reviews of Yu’s work performance. Before El-Daoushy became her manager, Yu received an overall rating of “Excellent” in her performance reviews. For Yu’s 2015 performance review, El-Daoushy rated Yu as “Successful,” which was a lower rating than “Excellent.” Yu believed she deserved a higher rating and a promotion. In a 2016 performance review, El-Daoushy gave Yu an overall rating of “Performance Needs Improvement.” According to El-Daoushy, Yu had refused assignments and exhibited a “lack of communication etiquette.” El- Daoushy sought to place Yu on a “Performance Improvement Plan” (or PIP). Yu disagreed with the performance review and characterized the PIP as “an explicit act of personal retaliation” against her for her disagreement with El- Daoushy’s performance reviews. In October 2016, Yu began a 12-week medical leave of absence due to her exhaustion and insomnia from working long hours at Kaiser. Her physician later extended her leave through…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.