People v. Burnham CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
INTRODUCTION
In 1981, a jury convicted defendant and appellant Floyd Burnham of first degree
murder after hearing evidence that he and his accomplice Audis Coley robbed and killed
a man who had picked them up as hitchhikers. At trial, Coley testified that Burnham had
devised the plan to rob the victim of his money and truck and had been the one to shoot
the victim when that plan went awry. Burnham was sentenced to 25 years to life plus two
years.
In 2022, Burnham filed a resentencing petition under Penal Code section 1172.6,
alleging that he could not currently be convicted of murder because of recent changes to
felony murder liability made by Senate Bill No. 1437 (2017-2018 Reg. Sess.) (Senate Bill
1437). (Pen. Code, § 1172.6, subd. (a).)1 Following an evidentiary hearing, the trial
court found beyond a reasonable doubt that Burnham was guilty of murder under current
law because he was a major participant in the robbery who acted with reckless
indifference to human life. (§ 189, subd. (e)(3).)
On appeal, Burnham argues that the trial court violated his federal due process
right to a fair trial by excluding the defense investigator’s statement that Coley’s…