Niemann

Niemann v. LVNV Funding CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 13, 2026H052797California1,474 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

We take our factual summary from plaintiff’s complaint, accepting as true all well-pleaded material facts. (Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Sream, Inc. (2022) 83 Cal.App.5th 721, 728–729.) Defendant LVNV Funding, LLC is a debt buyer that purchased plaintiff’s consumer debt from the original creditor Citibank N.A., which had charged off the debt as a loss when plaintiff defaulted on his payments.2 Defendant

Civil Code section 1788.50 et seq.; undesignated statutory references are to this Code.

2 The Act defines “Debt Buyer” as “a person or entity that is regularly engaged in the business of purchasing charged-off consumer debt for collection purposes, whether it collects the (through its agent, Financial Recovery Services, Inc.) sent plaintiff a written communication about the debt that included the required notice of plaintiff’s right to request records, but in a smaller type size than required by the Act. (§ 1788.52, subd. (d)(1).) Plaintiff filed a class action complaint asserting a single cause of action and seeking statutory damages based on defendant’s violation of the Act’s minimum required type size. Defendant answered and moved for judgment on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.