Doe

Doe v. Johnson CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 13, 2026B338030MCalifornia3,005 words

Opinion

Opinion

Viramontes, J.

Filed 3/13/26 Doe v. Johnson CA2/

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

JANE DOE, B338030

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 21STCV42590) v.

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION,

TAZMAN JAMES JOHNSON, DENYING PETITION FOR

REHEARING, AND DENYING

Defendant and Respondent. REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

THE COURT:

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing filed March 3, 2026 is denied, the request for judicial notice filed March 10, 2026 is denied, and the opinion filed February 27, 2026 is modified as set forth below. To the extent Doe insists that Presiding Justice Stratton recuse herself, that request is denied. To the extent Doe requests publication of the opinion filed February 27, 2026, that request is also denied. There is no change in the judgment.

On page 9, in the first full paragraph, delete the final two sentences: Finally, we note that in her reply brief, which she filed in pro. per., Doe raises several new arguments. Because those arguments were not raised in her opening brief, we do not consider them. (See Doe…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.