King

King v. Perry

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 16, 202624-4841California736 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 16 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARVA KING, No. 24-4841

Plaintiff-Appellant,

MEMORANDUM*

v. D.C. Case No. 2:24-cv-02650-PA- JC TYLER PERRY, in his individual and representative capacity; TYLER PERRY STUDIOS, a Georgia limited liability company; and ARTHUR PRIMUS, in his individual and representative capacity;

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 10, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: RAWLINSON, N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges, and LIBURDI, District Judge.***

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Michael T. Liburdi, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.