Rodriguez-Arriaga

Rodriguez-Arriaga v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 16, 202622-615California664 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 16 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALBERTO RODRIGUEZ-ARRIAGA, No. 22-615 Agency No. Petitioner, A216-143-195 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 12, 2026** Las Vegas, Nevada

Before: BENNETT and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges, and EZRA, District Judge.***

Petitioner Alberto Rodriguez-Arriaga, a native and citizen of Mexico,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)

dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (IJ’s) denial of his application

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable David A. Ezra, United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation. for cancellation of removal. We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.