Murillo

Murillo v. Holland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 16, 202625-225California1,299 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 16 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOAQUIN MURILLO, No. 25-225 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 1:15-cv-00266-DC-SCR v.

MEMORANDUM*

K. HOLLAND, Warden; J. GUTIERREZ,

Deputy Warden,

Defendants - Appellants,

and

G. YBARRA, JORGE ANDRADE RICO,

MAHER CONRAD SUAREZ,

CHRISTOPHER LIPSEY, Jr.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dena M. Coggins, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 4, 2026 San Francisco, California

Before: M. SMITH and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and MORRIS, Chief District Judge.**

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Brian M. Morris, United States Chief District Judge for Wardens Holland and Gutierrez (Defendants) appeal the district court’s denial

of summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds. This case relates to a

decades-long class action related to mental health services provided to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.