People v. Pavia CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 16, 2026B338024California2,482 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/16/26 P. v. Pavia CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE, 2d Crim. No. B338024 (Super. Ct. No. LA093470) Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County)

v.

DANIEL A. RODRIGUEZ

PAVIA,

Defendant and Appellant.

Daniel A. Rodriguez Pavia appeals from the judgment after a jury convicted him of rape. (Pen. Code,1 § 261, subd. (a)(2).) He was sentenced to three years in state prison. He contends his conviction should be reversed because he was prejudiced by a four-year pre-charging delay. We affirm.

1 All statutory references are to the Penal Code.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Prosecution evidence In February 2016, Carlos Campos organized a birthday party for his girlfriend, J.J. He…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.