Rosas-Gonzalez

Rosas-Gonzalez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 17, 202623-3564California699 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 17 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA TERESA ROSAS-GONZALEZ, No. 23-3564 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-411-452 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 4, 2026** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: HAWKINS, BYBEE, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Maria Teresa Rosas-Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Mexico, seeks

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision upholding an

Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of her application for cancellation of removal. We

have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Where, as here, the BIA affirms the IJ, cites Matter of Burbano, “and does not

express disagreement with any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.