Wright

United States v. Wright

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 17, 202625-844California1,044 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 17 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 24-7126 & 25-844

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:23-cr-000492-PA-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

RYAN WRIGHT, AKA Ryan Petetit,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 12, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. ***

Defendant-Appellant Ryan Wright pled guilty to conspiracy to commit

honest services wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1343, and 1346. He challenges

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable David F. Hamilton, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation. a condition of supervised…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.