Singh

Singh v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 17, 202624-4550California670 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 17 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ABHIJEET SINGH, No. 24-4550 Agency No. Petitioner, A246-628-557 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 17, 2026**

Before: CLIFTON, FRIEDLAND, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner, Abhijeet Singh, a native and citizen of India, seeks review of a

Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s (IJ) decision that found him not credible and denied his

applications for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.

“When the BIA adopts the IJ’s decision with a citation to Matter of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.